

Preparing for a BRCGS audit can feel like ticking off a long checklist, but passing it requires much more than that.
Many organizations enter the audit confident, only to face unexpected non-conformities. Why? Because BRCGS certification is not just about having systems, it’s about proving they work consistently.
Consider this:
The difference between passing smoothly and struggling through corrective actions often comes down to how well your system is implemented, not just documented.
In this blog, we’ll uncover the top 12 BRCGS audit non-conformities and show you exactly how to fix them quickly so you can achieve food safety certification without unnecessary delays.
Achieving BRCGS certification is more than just passing an audit it reflects your organization’s commitment to BRCGS food safety standards and operational excellence.
Here’s why it matters:
However, certification success depends heavily on how well your systems align with the BRCGS audit checklist. Even minor gaps can lead to non-conformities that delay certification. Â
.
Non-conformities are deviations from the requirements defined in the BRCGS standard. During a BRCGS audit, auditors assess your processes, documentation, and implementation against a structured framework.
Types of non-conformities:
1. Critical: A critical non-conformity indicates a serious failure in the BRCGS food safety system. It directly impacts product safety, legality, or consumer health. Such issues can lead to immediate audit failure and must be addressed urgently before certification can be granted.
2. Major: A major non-conformity highlights a significant gap in system implementation or control. While it may not pose an immediate safety risk, it can affect the effectiveness of your BRCGS compliance if not corrected. Certification is usually delayed until proper corrective actions are implemented.
3. Minor: A minor non-conformity is a small or isolated lapse in compliance, often related to documentation or minor process deviations. It does not directly impact food safety but indicates areas for improvement. If ignored, these issues can escalate in future BRCGS audits.
A poorly implemented HACCP plan is one of the most critical gaps identified during a BRCGS audit. Many organizations prepare HACCP documentation, but it does not reflect actual production practices, leading to ineffective hazard control and audit findings.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Documentation is essential for demonstrating BRCGS compliance, as it provides evidence of consistent implementation. However, many businesses struggle with maintaining accurate and controlled records.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Strong leadership involvement is a key requirement in BRCGS certification. When top management is not actively engaged, it weakens the overall food safety culture and system effectiveness.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Internal audits are a critical tool for identifying gaps before the actual BRCGS audit. However, many organizations treat them as a routine task rather than a strategic process.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
An ineffective CAPA system often leads to repeated non-conformities because organizations focus on quick fixes rather than identifying and eliminating root causes. Without proper root cause analysis, documentation, and effectiveness checks, the same issues continue to resurface during audits, indicating weak system control and poor continuous improvement practices.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Cleaning and sanitation are directly linked to BRCGS food safety performance, and any inconsistency in execution or monitoring can increase contamination risks. When cleaning procedures are not properly validated or verified, it creates gaps between documented processes and actual practices, which auditors quickly identify as a serious compliance concern.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
An ineffective pest control system can result in significant food safety risks and major audit findings, especially when monitoring records, trend analysis, or preventive actions are missing. Simply having a pest control program is not enough; organisations must demonstrate active control, regular review, and timely corrective actions.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Employees are critical to maintaining BRCGS compliance, but without proper training and competency evaluation, even well-designed systems fail during execution. Lack of awareness, inconsistent training programs, and absence of skill assessment often led to operational errors that directly impact audit outcomes.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Supplier management is essential for achieving food safety Certification, yet weak approval processes or a lack of ongoing monitoring can introduce risks into the supply chain. Organizations must ensure suppliers are evaluated, approved, and periodically reviewed to maintain compliance and product integrity.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Traceability is a key requirement in BRCGS audits, ensuring organizations can quickly track and recall products when needed. Weak systems, incomplete records, or a lack of testing through mock recalls can delay response times and increase the impact of food safety incidents.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Allergen control is a critical responsibility in food safety, and failures can lead to severe health risks and reputational damage. Inadequate segregation, improper labelling, or lack of employee awareness are common gaps that auditors identify, making allergen management a high-risk area in audits.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Facility conditions directly impact hygiene and compliance, and poor infrastructure or delayed maintenance can create contamination risks. Issues such as damaged surfaces, equipment failures, or inadequate upkeep often result in non-conformities, highlighting the need for a proactive maintenance approach.
Common gaps:
How to close it fast:
Closing non-conformities in a BRCGS audit requires a structured and disciplined approach, not just quick fixes. Auditors expect organizations to demonstrate control, consistency, and continuous improvement. This means focusing on identifying the true root cause of issues and implementing corrective actions that prevent recurrence, rather than simply addressing surface-level symptoms.
Best practices to follow:
Organizations that adopt a proactive and structured approach to BRCGS compliance not only close non-conformities faster but also strengthen their overall food safety management system, making future audits smoother and more predictable.
Facing repeated non-conformities or delayed certification?
At 4C Consulting, we bring 20+ years of practical audit and implementation experience, helping organizations move from documentation-heavy systems to fully audit-ready operations.
We don’t just prepare you for audits, we help you build systems that actually work.
Get a structured BRCGS audit readiness plan. Connect with our experts today.
The timeline depends on the severity of the non-conformity. Minor issues can be resolved within a few days, while major non-conformities may take several weeks, especially if system changes or process improvements are required.
If non-conformities are not closed within the specified timeframe, it can lead to delay or failure in BRCGS certification, additional audit costs, and potential loss of business opportunities.
Major non-conformities indicate significant system failures that can impact BRCGS compliance, while minor ones are small, isolated issues that do not immediately affect food safety.
Yes, small and medium-sized businesses can achieve food safety certification by implementing the required systems and processes, often with expert guidance.
Preparation should include conducting internal audits based on the BRCGS audit checklist, reviewing HACCP plans, ensuring proper documentation, and training employees on food safety practices.